when the bell rungs, child A's father came angrily and drag child B. The teacher approached the father of child A and get child B.father A was making a mess on the school grounds so the teacher asked the brother of child B to fetch their mother to settle things up. Child B parents came and the teacher told the incident. Both father had a conversation with themselves without the teacher.the day after, they filled a case against the teacher.father A asked some help coz father B didnt help them so the faculty contributed.father A asked help again for medicine and told the teacher,she should help coz its in her custody.PLease help WHAT LEGAL ADVICE YOU CAN GIVE? Does the teacher has a right not to help again the child A?
Okay ... you've managed to really confuse me. So, teacher steps out, B accidentally injures A. Teacher does a check to the best of her ability, assesses that serious injury is unlikely, and so does not seek further assistance.
Father of A shows up, did you say dragging B? As in physically pulling him? B's dad should press charges against A's dad for assualt, to be honest here.
Teacher intervenes, gets B from A's dad. A's dad gets out of control and ... this is where you start to lose me. The two dads talked with each other (not themselves, I think you mean?) and both are pressing charges against the teacher? What are their charges? A, I can understand, but B?
The faculty of the school is giving A's dad money to help with ... something. And he's asked for money for medicine (uhhh, a corneal scratch? C'mon, he'd better have receipts). Teacher is being told by A's dad she should pay because A was in her custody when the injury happened.
I'm not a lawyer, but here's what I'm thinking. Teacher shouldn't pay anything until there is a legal decision made. She might be found liable for some amount of the medicine, (is the child in her custody or the school's?), but if she pays up front without a legal ruling she might be pecieved as admitting guilt.
In the future, the teacher really should be aware that serious eye injuries do not necessarily bleed. If there is a chance of an eye injury, the child should see a doctor ASAP, before infection has a chance of setting in; simply washing it won't really help. In my case, I nearly lost my vision in one eye (would have if the cat's claw had been a couple micrometers more to the left), and there was NO blood. There was little sign (other than searing pain) until the doctor had a stain in my eye and a magnifying glass ... which he dropped.PLease help WHAT LEGAL ADVICE YOU CAN GIVE? Does the teacher has a right not to help again the child A?
That was a confusing story. What I got out of it was that the teacher should have sent the child (A) to the nurse and notified his parents, and never should have identified child B to the parents of child A. There should have also been an assistant or someone in the room to supervise if the teacher was out. She is responsible for the incident since she was not watching them.
Child A gets pissed off because of his cut cornea, so he comes back shooting at his classmates.
Well the question now is who are the adult's here? True enough there should've been a teacher's aide in the room but that doesn't make it the teacher's fault. This is a story of the school system being not up to par. There is absolutely no way that these rooms should be without extra help. Kids will be just that, kids. And the parents need to also look at just that and be Ggrateful that it was a ruler and not a pencil or a knife , or a gun for that matter. I believe that the parents are being childish in this case. Making a mountain out of a mole hill.
No comments:
Post a Comment